Show Posts

1411

Patch Notes & Development / Re: OpenEtG Patch Notes

« on: October 21, 2014, 06:16:35 pm »

Armagio costs 4
Despair has a 40% base procrate (from 20%) after comparing actual numbers against Fire Shield
Graviton Deployer's casting cost was updated to suit card text (Costs 2 unupped, 1 upped)
Debris Barricade only gains 2 charges on destroy events
Spite, Repulsor, & Firebrand cost reduced by 1
Time Bomb's tick cost is 0 (not Time Terror)
Unupped Clockwork Golem's Wind costs 1. Upped clockwork golem has 8 life
Unupped gladius costs 1, upped has 5 attack

1412

Decks / Re: Demigod Prediction Decks

« on: October 21, 2014, 03:18:57 am »

Another Sesha counter: Ouija Cats. Seems better than P2W mono water, tho goose is instalose

02717036ts036ve066ua0671f0171m0571g0471b018pj

1413

Decks / Re: Eclipse/Shadow/Skeleton Rush

« on: October 19, 2014, 02:47:07 pm »

05606055uk065vf015ur015v1045uq065ut015up015ul018pt

Unupped skele/nightfall not so good. Above rushes novice endurance well

1414

Decks / Re: Demigod Prediction Decks

« on: October 18, 2014, 01:46:32 am »

Unupped500 Thetis

06564015990b4sa014sb035fi025ia065rp018pl

Akan's mono water counter beats Sesha

1415

General Game Discussion / Pack Rebalance

« on: October 14, 2014, 03:57:35 am »

Code: [Select]

#!/usr/bin/python
from functools import reduce
def f(cost, *x):
	bump = .45/sum(x)
	if bump == .45:bump = 0
	b=[0]
	for a in x:
		b[-1] += a-a*bump
		b.append(a*bump)
	print(b, cost, sum(costs[x]*b[x] for x in range(5) if x < len(b)))
	return b
#costs = [5/3, 20/3, 100/3, 40, 250]
costs = [1.375, 5, 30, 35, 250]
#f(15, 9)
f(15, 10)
f(25, 3, 3)
f(65, 3, 4, 1)
f(100, 4, 3, 1, 1)
f(250, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1)

Code: [Select]

(format: expected amount of rarities per pack level, cost of pack, expected pack value)
Commented output (Current state of affairs)
[8.55, 0.45] 15 17.25
[2.775, 3.0, 0.22499999999999998] 25 32.125
[2.83125, 3.94375, 1.16875, 0.05625] 65 72.21875
[3.8, 3.0500000000000003, 1.1, 1.0, 0.05] 100 115.83333333333334
[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0] 250 250.0
New output (Result of proposal)
[9.55, 0.44999999999999996] 15 15.381250000000001
[2.775, 3.0, 0.22499999999999998] 25 25.565625
[2.83125, 3.94375, 1.16875, 0.05625] 65 60.64296875
[4.775, 3.0900000000000003, 1.0899999999999999, 1.0, 0.045] 100 100.975
[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0] 250 250.0

Essentially I'm proposing 3 changes:
Make Bronze give 10 commons
Reduce cost of Gold pack to 60
Modify calcWealth to value cards with these new values [1.375, 5, 30, 35, 250]
(possibly) readjust sell values (this would only lower sell value of Shard atm)

This proposal is live

Useful numbers from http://wims.unice.fr/wims/en_tool~linear~linsolver.en.html
If Gold cost 50, then solution is { x1 = 1.297970749735931, x2 = 5.787509644493023, x3 = 17.9360099377943, x4 = 45.11853403633169, x5 = 250.0 }
As is, true value is { x1 = 1.34296277607093, x2 = 4.832678863383583, x3 = 30.11218536112181, x4 = 34.58209301278322, x5 = 250.0 }
Having Gold cost 65 results in rares being valued higher than shards. Values after raritybump implemented: { x1 = 1.534119028990239, x2 = 4.185071782518781, x3 = 36.38935265331437, x4 = 28.82831543647584, x5 = 250.0 }

1416